Latest Essays

• The Original Sin

  Aug 29, 2026 Admin 0 Comments

  Let's delve into a topic that's been debated for centuries. But as it always goes with anything I write, this is simply my opinion. 
  
  So, what is the Original Sin, or the sin that Adam and Eve are known for? Everyone will say that they ate the fruit from the Tree of Knowledge. But if you ask me, I believe Adam took the fruit from Chava's hands and ate it, fully knowing it was forbidden, since G-d told him not to eat it; he fell for it without putting up a fight. I believe the Original Sin of Adam and Eve should be known in the order of events: Chava giving the fruit to Adam, and Adam taking and eating it with no resistance on his part. 
  
  Now the question should be: how will Hashem help the Nation fix this sin?
  
  In Parashat Lech Lecha 15-17:22, G-d makes a covenant with Avraham Avinu, the Covenant of the Halves. In it, Hashem promises Avraham Avinu offspring as many as the stars in Heaven. Avraham believes Hashem and brings sacrifices. But when he comes home, Sarah offers him Hagar since they have no children, and Avraham agrees. 
  
  Parashat Lech Lecha 16:2 - And Sarai said to Abram, "Look, G-d has kept me from bearing. Consort with my maid; perhaps I shall have a child through her." And Abram heeded Sarai’s request.  
  
  What happened to the covenant made between Avraham and Hashem, where Hashem promised him offspring as many as the stars in Heaven? How did he agree with his wife so quickly without protesting?
  
  In Parashat Lech Lecha 17:1-3 - When Abram was ninety-nine years old, G-d appeared to Abram and said to him, "I am El Shaddai. Walk in My ways and be blameless. I will establish My covenant between You and Me, and I will make you exceedingly numerous. Abram threw himself on his face." (Off-topic: Just to show you another personality in Torah that was blameless, Noach: "When Hashem came to Noach, he was already Tamim - Noah was a righteous man; he was blameless in his age; Noah walked with G-d.")
  
  But back to Avraham Avinu, Abram threw himself on his face - this is when he realized he had made a mistake, although I bet it was eating him inside, since he had made a covenant with G-d but gave in too fast to his wife's demands. The situation we deal with in that region is what was left to us from the above episode. 
  
  Since Avraham Avinu couldn't fix Adam's sin, Hashem awaits his son, Yitzchak. In Parashat Toldot 25:22, it says: Isaac pleaded with G-d on behalf of his wife, because she was infertile; and G-d responded to his plea, and his wife Rivkah conceived." 
  
  Says Rashi, לנכח אשתו opposite his wife — He stood in one corner and prayed while she stood in the other corner and prayed (Genesis Rabbah 63:5). And Hashem answered his prayer.
  
  Continues Rashi: ויעתר לו [AND THE LORD] WAS ENTREATED OF HIM — of him and not of her, because there is no comparison between the prayer of a righteous person who is the son of a righteous person and the prayer of a righteous person who is the child of a wicked-person — therefore G-d allowed himself to be entreated of him and not of her (Masechet Yevamot 64a). 
  
  But I believe the above sentence can be understood a bit differently. 
  
  We are introduced to the Shalom Bayit issue - the first instance ever recorded in the Torah.
  
  Rivkah Imenu also did not have children for many years, and just like Sarah Imenu, she approached her husband and offered him her maid to have children with. But Yitzchak Avinu did not want to do this. His train of thought was as follows: I was the sacrifice my father Avraham Avinu brought when I was 37 years old; I am holy and elevated above all;  and now you want me to be with your maid and have children with her? No! This is not something I will do, or in any way or form agree with!!
  
  Their views radically differed; opposite to his wife, "he is in one corner, and she is in the other." Hashem loved his approach and dedication - and answered "his prayer". 
  
  Adam's sin of not standing up to his wife and making the right choice was corrected by Yitzchak Avinu, who stood up to his wife, no matter how much stress or headache she gave him, and did not go with her maid; he had children only with Rivkah Imenu. 
  
  Yay, we should be happy that the sin of Adam and Eve is fixed!! No, not at all. This sin consists of two parts. Adam HaRishon giving in to his wife's demand, and Hashem's response to the situation.
  
  In Parashat Bereshit 3:6, it says: "וַתֵּ֣רֶא הָֽאִשָּׁ֡ה כִּ֣י טוֹב֩ הָעֵ֨ץ לְמַאֲכָ֜ל וְכִ֧י תַֽאֲוָה־ה֣וּא לָעֵינַ֗יִם וְנֶחְמָ֤ד הָעֵץ֙ לְהַשְׂכִּ֔יל וַתִּקַּ֥ח מִפִּרְי֖וֹ וַתֹּאכַ֑ל וַתִּתֵּ֧ן גַּם־לְאִישָׁ֛הּ עִמָּ֖הּ וַיֹּאכַֽל׃  - When the woman saw that the tree was good for eating and a delight to the eyes, and that the tree was desirable as a source of wisdom, she took of its fruit and ate. She also gave some to her husband, and he ate." 
  
  Per Oral Torah tradition, the word לְאִישָׁ֛הּ - Le Yisha is translated as to her husband, due to a dagesh in the Hey - a dot in the last letter Hey. But when the text is written in the Sefer Torah scroll, it has no vowels and no Dagesh in the word לאישה - Le Yisha is written, so this word can also be translated as: To a Woman. 
  
  Let me present you with a bunch of questions:
  
  - Why was Hashem's response comparing Adam to a woman? Hashem could have used any other word, where there would be no need for the Oral Torah tradition for this sentence.
  - What is Hashem trying to tell us?
  - When, how, and who has atoned for Adam HaRishon, his remaining part of the tikkun?
  
  Hashem has left us a MAJOR clue; He doesn't leave these types of clues for no reason. Why did He do that?
  
  And the most important question we should ask ourselves: what do we do with this piece of information? 
  
  Attention, to the holy Rebbes: Please...allow me to present the rest of the answer. 
  
  Shmuel Katanov
  
  

  Read more

• The Fight of Two Men

  Aug 21, 2026 Admin 0 Comments

  I will start with a disclaimer: I am simply sharing my opinion and how I understand the verses. Some may not agree, but again, this is just my opinion. 
  
  In Parashat Ki Tetzeh 25:11-12 says: "כִּֽי־יִנָּצ֨וּ אֲנָשִׁ֤ים יַחְדָּו֙ אִ֣ישׁ וְאָחִ֔יו וְקָֽרְבָה֙ אֵ֣שֶׁת הָֽאֶחָ֔ד לְהַצִּ֥יל אֶת־אִישָׁ֖הּ מִיַּ֣ד מַכֵּ֑הוּ וְשָׁלְחָ֣ה יָדָ֔הּ וְהֶחֱזִ֖יקָה בִּמְבֻשָֽׁיו׃  - If two parties are fighting—one man with another—and the wife of one comes up to save her husband from his opponent and puts out her hand and seizes him by his genitals,  וְקַצֹּתָ֖ה אֶת־כַּפָּ֑הּ לֹ֥א תָח֖וֹס עֵינֶֽךָ׃ - you shall cut off her hand; show no pity."
  
  The words that raise a red flag for me would be the words ְוְשָׁלְחָ֣ה יָדָ֔הּ - VeShalkha Yada - She sent her hand - the word Yada has a dagesh, and the word אֶת־אִישָׁ֖הּ - Et Yisha has a dagesh - a DOT in the letter הּ - Hey. Why? 
  
  To understand the above statement, let's look at another statement in the Torah, and then I believe the above will make sense.
  
  I believe Adam made another mistake. I believe it was swept under the rug. I believe it has received little "media attention" or discussion over the centuries. And I think it is the key to unlocking the above pasuk. 
  
  In Parashat Bereshit 3:6, Chava gave Adam HaRishon a fruit from the Tree of Knowledge, and he ate it. It says: "וַתֵּ֣רֶא הָֽאִשָּׁ֡ה כִּ֣י טוֹב֩ הָעֵ֨ץ לְמַאֲכָ֜ל וְכִ֧י תַֽאֲוָה־ה֣וּא לָעֵינַ֗יִם וְנֶחְמָ֤ד הָעֵץ֙ לְהַשְׂכִּ֔יל וַתִּקַּ֥ח מִפִּרְי֖וֹ וַתֹּאכַ֑ל וַתִּתֵּ֧ן גַּם־לְאִישָׁ֛הּ עִמָּ֖הּ וַיֹּאכַֽל׃  - When the woman saw that the tree was good for eating and a delight to the eyes, and that the tree was desirable as a source of wisdom, she took of its fruit and ate. She also gave some to her husband, and he ate." 
  
  Per our Oral Torah tradition, the word לְאִישָׁ֛הּ - Le Yisha is translated as to her husband, due to a dagesh in the Hey - a dot in the last letter Hey. But as you know, when the text is written in the Sefer Torah scroll, it has no vowels and no Dagesh in the word לאישה - Le Yisha is written, so this word can also be translated as To a Woman. 
  
  So, here goes my question: Is there a connection between the woman in the case of two men fighting and Chava, when she gave the fruit to Adam?
  
  I strongly believe there's one. 
  
  When G-d told Adam HaRishon not to eat from the Tree of Knowledge, Adam told his wife not to touch the tree in order to prevent his wife from breaking the word of G-d and from eating the fruit from the Tree of Knowledge. Persuaded by the snake, Chavah ate from the tree and made Adam eat it. But what drove her to do this? Besides the snake, it was her Chutzpah.
  
  A quick search in the dictionary gave the following definition:
  
  Chutzpah: 
  Utter nerve; haughtiness.
  Nearly arrogant courage; utter audacity, supreme self-confidence; exaggerated self-opinion;
  (Yiddish) unbelievable gall; insolence; audacity.
  
  For Chavah, Adam's word and the word of G-d - did not mean much, and this led her to listen to the Snake and eat from the Tree. 
  
  The same behavior is noticed in the incident of two men fighting. A woman must be loyal to her husband no matter the situation, but this woman, driven by the desire to save her husband, had the Chutzpah to grab her husband's opponent by his private part, thus going against the laws of modesty given by G-d, and did it right there in the presence of her husband.
  
  The Torah continues: "You shall cut off her hand; show no pity." This trait of behavior: Chutzpah was noticed in Chavah and later in the above-mentioned woman, who still carried that same trait.
  
  As a remedy, the Torah introduces us to the Holy Scroll.
  
  

  
  PS: But this would be a half-baked idea to leave this essay without a finishing touch. So, please allow me to end it, à la my style. 
  
  Above, we understand how the atonement of Chavah happens when a similar trait is found in other women; every time a woman portrays a trait similar to Chavah's, Torah tells us what to do and how to fix the situation.
  
  But, how about Adam?
  
  Since, per our Oral Torah tradition, the word לְאִישָׁ֛הּ - Le Yisha found in Parashat Bereshit 3:6 is translated as to her husband, due to a dagesh in the Hey - a dot in the last letter Hey. But in the Torah scroll, this word is לאישה - Le Yisha, translated as To a Woman, and not as To Her Husband. 
  
  Hashem doesn't leave these types of clues for no reason. What do we do with this piece of information? I can't keep on ignoring it anymore, and I can't live with: this is the tradition, and this is how we learn it.
  
  If you ask around, what is the Original Sin, or the sin that Adam and Eve are known for, everyone will say that they ate the fruit from the Tree of Knowledge. But if you ask me, Adam took fruit from Chava's hands and ate it, fully knowing it was forbidden, since G-d told him not to eat it; he fell for it without putting up a fight. I believe the Original Sin, or the First Sin this couple should be known for in order of events, is Chava giving the fruit to Adam, and Adam taking and eating it with no resistance on his part. 
  
  I have been saying all along about Aher, and how Aher was wronged, and how my opinion on this whole story differs. So, here's another one: Adam HaRishon - how and who has atoned for Adam? By the way, the atonement has already happened!!
  
  Gentlemen, this is HUGE!!
  
  This would be another piece of none: in my opinion, or I believe - I bet everything on it that everyone has missed it, and I know the answer... but I will share it on that day. 
  
  Till then, au revoir - goodbye, and thank you for reading some things that bother me.
  
  Shmuel Katanov
  
  

  Read more

• The Failed Mission - 2

  Aug 5, 2026 Admin 0 Comments

  Before you start, please read Part 1.
  
  As always, a disclaimer. Everything I write is simply my opinion and is not something you may or should agree with.
  
  All the questions presented in this essay are the ones I have learned about and have read explanations of, in English, from the books that I have access to, by the rabbis who have already stated their opinions on these topics. But I am still not satisfied with their answers, in my personal opinion. So, I would like to address them in my own way or raise questions that have not been asked before. With your permission, let's go!
  
  - In Parashat Vayishlach, when the nation is standing next to the waters of Yam Suf, it says that the sea didn't open until the sea saw the bones of Yosef HaTzaddik that Moshe Rabbenu was carrying, and in honor of Yosef, it parted. So, I don't understand why the Mashiach of the generation - Moshe Rabbenu - has suddenly become irrelevant? Who or what made him so irrelevant? Why does the sea see Yosef's casket and parts in his honor, but totally disregards the presence of Moshe Rabbenu?? Why? I understand this differently.
  
  - In Parashat Bereshit, we know of the sin that Adam and Chava have committed, eating the fruit from the Tree of Knowledge, but there's another sin that they have committed. I don't understand why this one was swept under the rug. How come no big deal is made out of it? And the BIG question is, who has atoned for it?
  
  - In Parashat Yitro, when Yitro came to Moshe in the desert, he brought with him Moshe's wife and 2 kids. I don't understand: at a time when the nation was having four to six children at once, why did Moshe Rabbenu have only two?
  
  - How about this one: Moshe Rabbenu has committed another "sin," but for some reason, he came out of it, or Hashem did not hold him liable for it, at least at that time, or so it seems. But someone had to atone for it. Who was that? Someone got the beating from Hashem for it. I don't understand why no one speaks about it.
  
  In addition to the above questions, I would like to touch on my favorite topic: Aher.
  
  - In Masechet Chagigah 14b-15b, I have plenty of problems with the Aher and the way this Gemara was explained, but I would like to add a few more points:
  
  I still stand by my personal rule: No Tannah EVER GOES OFF THE DEREKH. The fact that Rabbi Elisha ben Avuyah was mistreated really bothers me. So, let's revisit this list.
  
  The Gemara relates: The daughter of Aḥer came before Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi and said to him: "Rabbi, provide me with sustenance, as I am in need of food." He said to her, "Whose daughter are you?" She said to him: I am the daughter of Aḥer. He said to her, angrily: Is there still of his seed remaining in the world? But isn't it stated: "He shall have neither son nor grandson among his people, nor any remaining in his dwellings" (Job 18:19)? She said to him: Remember his Torah, and do not remember his deeds. Immediately, fire descended and licked Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi's bench. Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi wept and said: If G-d protects the honor of those who treat the Torah with contempt in such a manner, as Aḥer despised the Torah and relinquished its teachings, how much more so would He do for those who treat it with honor. 
  
  How come Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi did not, for a second, think that the fact that the fire descended from above meant that Aher meant much more to Hashem, and that's why the fire hit Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi's bench, in order to stop him from discussing Aher?
  
  And if the daughter of Aher was still alive, then this pasuk: "He shall have neither son nor grandson among his people or any remaining in his dwellings" (Job 18:19) doesn't apply to Aher. 
  
  On top of it, there's an opinion that Aher had one daughter, some say a few, but from this daughter was born the Tanna Rabbi Yaakov, who was the teacher of the redactor of the Mishnah - Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi; see Kiddushin 39b, Chulin 142a. So, in my opinion, his daughter stayed alive, and he had a grandson who joined the ranks of the transmitters of the Oral Torah, so the pasuk does not apply to Rabbi Elisha ben Avuyah or Aher at all.
  
  - But again, why did Rabbi Elisha ben Avuyah go off the derekh, as it seems? What happened? 
  
  - When Aher passed away, it is written Ki Nakh Nafshe, Aher passed away in a gentler form. Rashi says that this expression is used when a righteous individual passes away. But hold on - you should ask: wasn't he a sinner? Why wasn't a different word used for him, like, for example, Shekhiv - died, as it says in Dikdukey Soferim? Very legit question, and it should sound an alarm that something is not right here. At least it did for me.
  
  - But we still don't know what made Rabbi Elisha ben Avuyah a sinner? The reason isn't mentioned in any of the books, but it's something we need to find out. Once we understand this, which is somewhat a major part, we will understand the story better.
  
  - Why did Ben Azai die? I know the answer the Gemara has given, but I think there may be another reason.
  
  - What did Ben Zomah mean in his answer to Rabbi Yehoshua ben Ḥananya? What are those three fingers?
  
  - Rabbi Akiva - He is the only one who came out unscathed from the Pardes, really? I have a lot to say about this.
  
  - And why did these four go to Pardes?
  
  The knowledge of Pardes lies within the most advanced realm of Maaseh Merkavah. And someone wants me to believe that a person like Aher, who has mastered this type of knowledge, WENT OFF THE DEREKH?????
  
  I don't think so, and I don't believe this even for a second! I strongly stand by it, and I am willing to defend my stance.
  
  Someone told me that I don't have the credentials for rabbis to even consider coming to me. True, I agree with him. I am just a regular guy with too much time on my hands, which I spent writing essays. And amongst these essays, you will find essays in defense of Bar Kamtza & King David, exposing Yitro, Eliyahu HaNavi, Moshe hitting the rock, the red heifer, an alien fire, modesty, loyalty, the rejected trio, unity,  justice, and lots of other topics.
  
  I believe the above essays are the result of more than 20 years of learning and the credentials required to gain the attention of the esteemed rabbis. 
  
  And now all I am saying is I have the keys to unlock the issue of Aher. Since this one topic goes so deep and wide, I believe it reveals many aspects of Torah we know of in a different light. And just to be politically correct, which I've learned over the years, I can't say that all the opinions expressed to date are wrong, but I will say that my opinion radically differs from everything written to date on this topic. I have been sounding the alarm for years about Aher and other topics, but NO rabbis or decision-makers have given me a chance to explain myself. It's no-strings-attached, and I would love a chance to share it.
  
  PS: It seems to me that someone has pulled a fast one on us and concealed it with a lengthy discussion in the Talmud about Aher. But in the midst of it, he has left a clue - for which I am thankful, and I believe it was done on purpose; with it, we can finally find the truth. All the generations before us have missed it; that's why I am having a tough time accepting their opinions on this topic, but I believe I have uncovered the truth. I fully realize the authorities I am going against, from our time to the times of the Tannayim; and the legal loophole I have found allows me to do just that. I am not presenting anything of my own, but simply putting this whole puzzle together in the right order.
  
  So, without further ado, please allow me to reveal to you a new personality, who is no longer Aher, but one and only Tannah HaKadosh Rabbi Elisha ben Avuyah!!
  
  Shmuel Katanov, aka Aher
  
  

  Read more

• Eliyahu HaNavi

  Jul 19, 2026 Admin 0 Comments

  Many times, you read passages in the Torah, and they seem pretty straightforward, but I believe there's much more hiding behind everything that is written. Let's look into one of these instances, where much is meant without saying it openly.
  
  In Parashat Matot 32, we are told a story of how the tribes of Reuven, Gad, and a half-tribe of Menashe approached Moshe Rabbenu and asked for permission to settle in the region East of the Jordan River, rather than living with the rest of the Nation in Eretz Yisrael. 
  
  Initially, Moshe Rabbenu becomes very angry with them, thinking they were avoiding going into the conquest of the land. But they have reassured him that they will settle only after the whole land is conquered and their brothers are settled there. Only then did Moshe Rabbenu agreed.
  
  This story sounds pretty straightforward, as I have said. But as always, I believe there's much more hidden behind the story. So, with your permission, let's dive into it.
  
  In the Parashat Vezot Haberakha 33:21, Moshe Rabbenu is blessing Gad, he says: "Bless you Gad, G-d should give you abundance...you chose the first portion for yourself, because there was the plot of the lawgiver." Explains Rashi on this word of Mekhokek - the Lawgiver, is Moshe. This is where Moshe Rabbenu's grave was hidden, so Gad didn't want to leave his Rebbe alone, outside of Eretz Yisrael.
  
  But why did Reuven join him? 
  
  In Parashat Vayishlach, Reuven moves the bed from Bilha's tent into his mother's tent. As a result of this action, Reuven loses his royal, priestly, and firstborn rights, which are given to his brothers. 
  
  In Parashat Shelach, when the spies return from their mission, the representative of Reuven's tribe makes a grave mistake and sides with the majority against Moshe. Years later, the Tribe of Reuven wants to make up to Moshe, or not lose the only thing it has left in their life, the connection with their Rebbe, and that's why the whole Tribe of Reuven stayed in the region East of the Jordan River.
  
  Why did Menashe join them? And why only half a tribe? What happened to the other half?
  
  When Yaakov Avinu blessed the sons of Yosef, at that moment Menashe lost his firstborn status, since it had been given to his brother Efraim, and he accepted it. But now, centuries later, when Moshe Rabbenu is about to leave this world, the tribe has a change of heart. The sons of Yosef were the royal family in Egypt, but they didn't retain that title, since the royalty went to Yehuda. On top of that, the first king comes from Benyamin, not Yosef, which really upset them. So, only half of the tribe of Menashe embraced the Psak, or the decision that Yaakov Avinu had made, and went and stayed outside of Israel with Moshe Rabbenu, since he was the Rebbe, or as if like grandfather Yaakov Avinu. The other half had a change of heart and went into the Land of Israel. That uneasy feeling or division between the sons of Yosef and the sons of Yehudah never changed.
  
  In Ezekiel 37:15-28 says: 
  
  וַיְהִ֥י דְבַר־יְהֹוָ֖ה אֵלַ֥י לֵאמֹֽר׃ - The word of GOD came to me: 
  
  וְאַתָּ֣ה בֶן־אָדָ֗ם קַח־לְךָ֙ עֵ֣ץ אֶחָ֔ד וּכְתֹ֤ב עָלָיו֙ לִֽיהוּדָ֔ה וְלִבְנֵ֥י יִשְׂרָאֵ֖ל חֲבֵרָ֑ו וּלְקַח֙ עֵ֣ץ אֶחָ֔ד וּכְת֣וֹב עָלָ֗יו לְיוֹסֵף֙ עֵ֣ץ אֶפְרַ֔יִם וְכׇל־בֵּ֥ית יִשְׂרָאֵ֖ל חֲבֵרָֽו׃ - And you, O mortal, take a stick and write on it, “Of Judah and the Israelites associated with him”; and take another stick and write on it, “Of Joseph—the stick of Ephraim—and all the House of Israel associated with him." 
  
  וְקָרַ֨ב אֹתָ֜ם אֶחָ֧ד אֶל־אֶחָ֛ד לְךָ֖ לְעֵ֣ץ אֶחָ֑ד וְהָי֥וּ לַאֲחָדִ֖ים בְּיָדֶֽךָ׃ - Bring them close to each other, so that they become one stick, joined together in your hand.  
  
  וְכַֽאֲשֶׁר֙ יֹאמְר֣וּ אֵלֶ֔יךָ בְּנֵ֥י עַמְּךָ֖ לֵאמֹ֑ר הֲלֽוֹא־תַגִּ֥יד לָ֖נוּ מָה־אֵ֥לֶּה לָּֽךְ׃ - And when any of your people ask you, "Won't you tell us what these actions of yours mean?"  
  
  דַּבֵּ֣ר אֲלֵהֶ֗ם כֹּה־אָמַר֮ אֲדֹנָ֣י יֱהֹוִה֒ הִנֵּה֩ אֲנִ֨י לֹקֵ֜חַ אֶת־עֵ֤ץ יוֹסֵף֙ אֲשֶׁ֣ר בְּיַד־אֶפְרַ֔יִם וְשִׁבְטֵ֥י יִשְׂרָאֵ֖ל חֲבֵרָ֑ו וְנָתַתִּי֩ אוֹתָ֨ם עָלָ֜יו אֶת־עֵ֣ץ יְהוּדָ֗ה וַֽעֲשִׂיתִם֙ לְעֵ֣ץ אֶחָ֔ד וְהָי֥וּ אֶחָ֖ד בְּיָדִֽי׃ - answer them, “Thus said the Sovereign GOD: I am going to take the stick of Joseph—which is in the hand of Ephraim—and of the tribes of Israel associated with him, and I will place the stick of Judah upon it and make them into one stick; they shall be joined in My hand.”  
  
  וְהָי֨וּ הָעֵצִ֜ים אֲֽשֶׁר־תִּכְתֹּ֧ב עֲלֵיהֶ֛ם בְּיָדְךָ֖ לְעֵינֵיהֶֽם׃ - You shall hold up before their eyes the sticks that you have inscribed,  
  
  וְדַבֵּ֣ר אֲלֵיהֶ֗ם כֹּה־אָמַר֮ אֲדֹנָ֣י יֱהֹוִה֒ הִנֵּ֨ה אֲנִ֤י לֹקֵ֙חַ֙ אֶת־בְּנֵ֣י יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל מִבֵּ֥ין הַגּוֹיִ֖ם אֲשֶׁ֣ר הָֽלְכוּ־שָׁ֑ם וְקִבַּצְתִּ֤י אֹתָם֙ מִסָּבִ֔יב וְהֵבֵאתִ֥י אוֹתָ֖ם אֶל־אַדְמָתָֽם׃ - and you shall declare to them: Thus said the Sovereign GOD: I am going to take the Israelite people from among the nations they have gone to, and gather them from every quarter, and bring them to their own land.  
  
  וְעָשִׂ֣יתִי אֹ֠תָ֠ם לְג֨וֹי אֶחָ֤ד בָּאָ֙רֶץ֙ בְּהָרֵ֣י יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל וּמֶ֧לֶךְ אֶחָ֛ד יִהְיֶ֥ה לְכֻלָּ֖ם לְמֶ֑לֶךְ וְלֹ֤א (יהיה) [יִֽהְיוּ־]עוֹד֙ לִשְׁנֵ֣י גוֹיִ֔ם וְלֹ֨א יֵחָ֥צוּ ע֛וֹד לִשְׁתֵּ֥י מַמְלָכ֖וֹת עֽוֹד׃ - I will make them a single nation in the land, on the hills of Israel, and one king shall be king of them all. Never again shall they be two nations, and never again shall they be divided into two kingdoms.  
  
  וְלֹ֧א יִֽטַּמְּא֣וּ ע֗וֹד בְּגִלּֽוּלֵיהֶם֙ וּבְשִׁקּ֣וּצֵיהֶ֔ם וּבְכֹ֖ל פִּשְׁעֵיהֶ֑ם וְהוֹשַׁעְתִּ֣י אֹתָ֗ם מִכֹּ֤ל מוֹשְׁבֹֽתֵיהֶם֙ אֲשֶׁ֣ר חָטְא֣וּ בָהֶ֔ם וְטִהַרְתִּ֤י אוֹתָם֙ וְהָיוּ־לִ֣י לְעָ֔ם וַאֲנִ֕י אֶהְיֶ֥ה לָהֶ֖ם לֵאלֹהִֽים׃ - Nor shall they ever again defile themselves by their fetishes and their abhorrent things, and by their other transgressions. I will save them in all their settlements where they sinned, and I will purify them. Then they shall be My people, and I will be their God.
  
  וְעַבְדִּ֤י דָוִד֙ מֶ֣לֶךְ עֲלֵיהֶ֔ם וְרוֹעֶ֥ה אֶחָ֖ד יִהְיֶ֣ה לְכֻלָּ֑ם וּבְמִשְׁפָּטַ֣י יֵלֵ֔כוּ וְחֻקּוֹתַ֥י יִשְׁמְר֖וּ וְעָשׂ֥וּ אוֹתָֽם׃ - My servant David shall be king over them; there shall be one shepherd for all of them. They shall follow My rules and faithfully obey My laws. 
  
  וְיָשְׁב֣וּ עַל־הָאָ֗רֶץ אֲשֶׁ֤ר נָתַ֙תִּי֙ לְעַבְדִּ֣י לְיַֽעֲקֹ֔ב אֲשֶׁ֥ר יָֽשְׁבוּ־בָ֖הּ אֲבֽוֹתֵיכֶ֑ם וְיָשְׁב֣וּ עָלֶ֡יהָ הֵ֠מָּה וּבְנֵיהֶ֞ם וּבְנֵ֤י בְנֵיהֶם֙ עַד־עוֹלָ֔ם וְדָוִ֣ד עַבְדִּ֔י נָשִׂ֥יא לָהֶ֖ם לְעוֹלָֽם׃ - Thus they shall remain in the land that I gave to My servant Jacob and in which your ancestors dwelt; they and their children and their children’s children shall dwell there forever, with My servant David as their prince for all time.  
  
  וְכָרַתִּ֤י לָהֶם֙ בְּרִ֣ית שָׁל֔וֹם בְּרִ֥ית עוֹלָ֖ם יִהְיֶ֣ה אוֹתָ֑ם וּנְתַתִּים֙ וְהִרְבֵּיתִ֣י אוֹתָ֔ם וְנָתַתִּ֧י אֶת־מִקְדָּשִׁ֛י בְּתוֹכָ֖ם לְעוֹלָֽם׃ - I will make a covenant of friendship with them—it shall be an everlasting covenant with them—I will establish them and multiply them, and I will place My Sanctuary among them forever.  
  
  וְהָיָ֤ה מִשְׁכָּנִי֙ עֲלֵיהֶ֔ם וְהָיִ֥יתִי לָהֶ֖ם לֵאלֹהִ֑ים וְהֵ֖מָּה יִהְיוּ־לִ֥י לְעָֽם׃ - My Presence shall rest over them; I will be their God and they shall be My people.  
  
  וְיָֽדְעוּ֙ הַגּוֹיִ֔ם כִּ֚י אֲנִ֣י יְהֹוָ֔ה מְקַדֵּ֖שׁ אֶת־יִשְׂרָאֵ֑ל בִּהְי֧וֹת מִקְדָּשִׁ֛י בְּתוֹכָ֖ם לְעוֹלָֽם׃ - And when My Sanctuary abides among them forever, the nations shall know that I, G-d, do sanctify Israel."
  
  Although our Sages tell us that Pinchas is Eliyahu. I have found a different opinion and would like to take that for a spin.
  
  In the Book of Me'am Loez, Parashat Vayechi (**for more sources see footnotes), it says, and I quote: "The actual order of birth of these brothers was Dan, Naphtali, Gad, and Asher. Still, Yaakov Avinu blessed Gad, right after Dan, skipping over Naphtali. When, in Dan's blessing, Jacob said, "For Your Help I Hope Oh G-d" (49:18), he had a prophetic experience and saw the redemption of Israel. At this time, he saw that Eliyahu, the herald or the messenger of Mashiach, would be a descendant of Gad. Therefore, he blessed Gad immediately after Dan." 
  
  Yaakov Avinu continues his blessing for Gad, or, later, for a descendant, Eliyahu HaNavi, in Parashat Vezot Haberakha 33:21: "...he came at the head of the nation, carrying out Hashem's justice and His law with Israel."
  
  The Prophet Malachi 3:23 says:"הִנֵּ֤ה אָנֹכִי֙ שֹׁלֵ֣חַ לָכֶ֔ם אֵ֖ת אֵלִיָּ֣ה הַנָּבִ֑יא לִפְנֵ֗י בּ֚וֹא י֣וֹם יְהֹוָ֔ה הַגָּד֖וֹל וְהַנּוֹרָֽא׃ - Behold, I will send Eliyahu HaNavi to you before the coming of the awesome, fearful day of GOD."
  
  The Prophet Isaiah 52:6-10 says:
  
  לָכֵ֛ן יֵדַ֥ע עַמִּ֖י שְׁמִ֑י לָכֵן֙ בַּיּ֣וֹם הַה֔וּא כִּֽי־אֲנִי־ה֥וּא הַֽמְדַבֵּ֖ר הִנֵּֽנִי׃ - For sure, My people shall learn My name, For sure [they shall learn] on that day, That I, the One who promised, Am now at hand. 
  
  ה־נָּאו֨וּ עַל־הֶהָרִ֜ים רַגְלֵ֣י מְבַשֵּׂ֗ר מַשְׁמִ֧יעַ שָׁל֛וֹם מְבַשֵּׂ֥ר ט֖וֹב מַשְׁמִ֣יעַ יְשׁוּעָ֑ה אֹמֵ֥ר לְצִיּ֖וֹן מָלַ֥ךְ אֱלֹהָֽיִךְ׃ - How beautiful upon the mountains are the feet of the messenger of good news. That announcer of peace, the forerunner of good news. That announces salvation; That says unto Zion: "Your G-d is King!
  
  ק֥וֹל צֹפַ֛יִךְ נָ֥שְׂאוּ ק֖וֹל יַחְדָּ֣ו יְרַנֵּ֑נוּ כִּ֣י עַ֤יִן בְּעַ֙יִן֙ יִרְא֔וּ בְּשׁ֥וּב ה׳ צִיּֽוֹן׃ - Your scouts raise their voices and sing together, for they shall see G-d's return to Zion with their own eyes. 
  
  פִּצְח֤וּ רַנְּנוּ֙ יַחְדָּ֔ו חׇרְב֖וֹת יְרוּשָׁלָ֑͏ִם כִּֽי־נִחַ֤ם ה׳ עַמּ֔וֹ גָּאַ֖ל יְרוּשָׁלָֽ͏ִם׃ - Break out in song, together, the ruins of Jerusalem! For G-d has consoled His people and redeemed Jerusalem! 
  
  חָשַׂ֤ף ה׳ אֶת־זְר֣וֹעַ קׇדְשׁ֔וֹ לְעֵינֵ֖י כׇּל־הַגּוֹיִ֑ם וְרָאוּ֙ כׇּל־אַפְסֵי־אָ֔רֶץ אֵ֖ת יְשׁוּעַ֥ת אֱלֹהֵֽינוּ׃ - G-d shall reveal His holy arm before all nations and all ends of the earth shall see salvations of our G-d.
  
  Behold, I sent Eliyahu HaNavi to you for the coming of the awesome, and fearful day of G-d.
  
  Shmuel Katanov
  
  _________________
  ** Eliyahu HaNavi is a descendant of Gad: Tzror Hamor, Bereshit Rabah 99:11, Bereshit Rabah 71:9, maintained so by Rabbi Nehorai. Eliyahu came from Gilead (1 Kings 17:1), and Gilead was a city of Gad (Joshua 13:25).

  Read more

• Yitro's Scheme Exposed

  Jul 16, 2026 Admin 0 Comments

  If you haven't read Part 1, I strongly suggest you do so before continuing, since everything here builds on what you learned in the previous part. With that, Let's Go!!
  
  So Yitro heard, came, and gave advice. He introduced the idea of hierarchical management, and I would guess that the "elections were held," or the selection of the 12 people was made, while he was still in the desert. And I do believe that he has influenced those 12 people, Roshe HaMatot - the heads of the Israelite tribes, as referred to them in Parashat Matot. One from each tribe was chosen to report to Moshe Rabbenu, but Yitro made sure those 12 would never support Moshe Rabbenu. After Yitro had laid the foundation, he left, knowing fully well his plan would work in the long run. And as it says in Parashat Shelach, his plan indeed has worked. 10 spies out of 12 went against Moshe Rabbenu by slandering the Land, and as a punishment, all the males ages 20-60 of that generation have passed away, along with Moshe Rabbenu, who also stayed behind in the desert, and never entered the Land of Israel. Except for the 2 spies - Yehoshuah and Caleb. Yehoshuah and Caleb never went along with their tribe's leaders' plans and stood by their Rebbe. 
  
  How come no one took Moshe's side, except for Yehoshuah and Caleb?
  
  Because Moshe Rabbenu held the highest possible rank in the nation: in holiness, social position, and age. Yitro knew how to play the game and ruin things for Moshe in the long run. There was nobody in the nation who could have said anything to change the opinion of the masses. By that time, Aharon HaCohen was struggling with his own problems: the loss of two sons and his role in the building of the golden calf, so he couldn't help. No one of that caliber could step in for Moshe Rabbenu.
  
  Get ready, if we merit it, a similar scenario will play out once again when the Son of David is revealed in the future. 
  
  In my opinion, the hierarchical model Yitro introduced is flawed: there are too many people between Moshe and the Nation, thus leading to too many opinions and unnecessary politics. Maybe that's what Hashem meant: He will have one shepherd, thus eliminating the model Yitro introduced back then, which will solve all the problems we currently have across the Nation and maybe even the world. Given the communication technologies we currently have access to, I believe it's achievable.
  
  As it says in Ezekiel 34:23-24: 
  וַהֲקִמֹתִ֨י עֲלֵיהֶ֜ם רֹעֶ֤ה אֶחָד֙ וְרָעָ֣ה אֶתְהֶ֔ן אֵ֖ת עַבְדִּ֣י דָוִ֑יד ה֚וּא יִרְעֶ֣ה אֹתָ֔ם וְהֽוּא־יִהְיֶ֥ה לָהֶ֖ן לְרֹעֶֽה׃ - Then I will appoint a single shepherd over them to tend them—My servant David. He shall tend them, he shall be a shepherd to them.  
  
  וַאֲנִ֣י הַשֵּׁם אֶֽהְיֶ֤ה לָהֶם֙ לֵֽאלֹהִ֔ים וְעַבְדִּ֥י דָוִ֖ד נָשִׂ֣יא בְתוֹכָ֑ם אֲנִ֥י הַשֵּׁם דִּבַּֽרְתִּי׃ - I, the ETERNAL One, will be their G-d, and My servant David shall be a ruler among them — I, G-d, have spoken. 
  
  Shmuel Katanov
  
  

  Read more